[tor-relays] Thoughts on new relay

Niklas Femerstrand nik at qnrq.se
Tue Feb 10 13:03:50 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Moin,

Our relay is online as of Jan 23 and recently I've been thinking about
pivoting it into a bridge instead. The relay lives in Cambodia and may
naturally be a bit off from the rest of the network (latency).

Consensus weight is steadily increasing despite various initial
downtime incidents, which you can see in Atlas graphs. (We've had some
network upgrades and during a separate event even had a monkey yanking
the eth from the nic.)

Currently we advertise 435.66 KB/s and with our current ~9d 10h uptime
we have downloaded 3.6 GB resp uploaded 3.7 GB. Theoretically our
tubes fit 10 Mbps download and 30 Mbps upload.

The question is whether the relay is worth keeping with its current
setup or if we can contribute more by re-configuring into a bridge.
Unfortunately it is very risky for us to allow exit traffic, but we <3
any cipher packet.

Please advice!
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/94F806110B23E727AE8BAD74DD95B0EE0B7A8EEC

Regards,

King Kong

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=hV51
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the tor-relays mailing list