[tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
arma at mit.edu
Mon Oct 13 01:20:51 UTC 2014
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:09:50AM +0100, Thomas White wrote:
> Anyone with access to create a new page on the list and we can add
> subsections to a new page containing the dated responses from each
> company on their policy towards Tor hosting.
> On 13/10/2014 01:56, subkeys at riseup.net wrote:
> > should the community start a revamp project (or start a whole new
> > list)? i'd be willing to donate my time to help get this started if
> > need be.
Sounds great, please do!
Also, while we're on the topic of good interactions with ISPs, let me
reiterate something I said back in November:
I worry about the "slash and burn agriculture" approach to running Tor
relays, where you set up an exit relay, and if anybody gets angry you move
on to another ISP. That approach is really appealing since it's simple,
but it assumes the Internet is infinite. If in fact we're destroying
land without regard to sustainability, and we run out of land...
Today's interactions with ISPs influence Tor's future viability.
More information about the tor-relays