[tor-relays] Fast Exit Node Operators - ISP in US

[ZEROF]

If you are looking for good solution, I'm testing right now
http://roundabove.com, running one exit node with exit rules provided
from https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy.

Tor's uptime is 11 days 12:00 hours, with 194 circuits open. I've sent
182.16 GB and received 178.18 GB.

Only what you need to do on your system is to set new hostnames in
/etc/rc.local. I use servernames without logging from this this list
http://wiki.opennicproject.org/Tier2 (France).


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: OpenPGP.js v0.7.2
Comment: http://openpgpjs.org

wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJUcUZVCRDHWR777fxuEQAAA6QP/jvqWdTKTH0mOJ3Nc2Fz
AwkT1lmRFf1/TOUl1DAK4JNIXloK33LAJ7sOnessSJ4g6tVqZL552nwMIAHK
dJ3UQntKWR+fmPb8rpgvAwFcTY6Yk3oKqZv8xRZTveFgvhpUsbhialDwBdSq
dB6/47IogkCekQVX8pbUus4uAUSsE83KFACTIWeStFWZ0ltpM5eQheW6kPjm
kp3MuQwawHYj5XCwj/l/ZaceOyzEoSAbAI9v/IMw1cuZvCX1jzShU7K4Tlgs
/I0Mk+vYNuI/eDvg/NFMJUza/YWRMDx5WxlNYJqZ6mNdYZXyZIakEpWAihoX
5GDl5UluFmBZwn5k+lI1lr9nl67hcR3YFfF1EXaZZq4WuOyrpy3vh0mzTpf/
6FtFjqC9275NfR7OmaNyd5vFJh9aUsvlr+2oq8hDG+4raTX0OFFiYSuePPxW
pEhb7UD6ngIJK2zK/m5mdiWWdU1pH3Kr4NdBTlDN6yvg7JT03dS1mIaYcioT
btQNZCJ5sr1FAHQpOScx0tJtqIROA35bZINnqpLvc5eoSyBQGhTiggstgAcL
qxmOBvvYTaWaWknpTRbekKlTaZzTH6pJRKoK2Lj2htbCusAM7NWnUi9TdtBh
rDgBkEmfqV+zy9u7sa40CtGnNxZ0Q4i0y8vNtREK3xI+VTZY6zssq6fOZ2A8
9i0X
=cD5N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


On 23 November 2014 at 02:58, Seth <list at sysfu.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:05:53 -0800, s7r <s7r at sky-ip.org> wrote:
>
>  I am concerned if they will sustain Tor exits on the long term. If the
>> Tor relay will consume more bandwidth they might start shouting about
>> it since more virtual machines share a network port, and they will
>> want to maximize how many VMs they can assign to a port in order to
>> maximize profit. Not to mention if the relay will be under DDoS attack.
>>
>
> I share all these concerns and s'pose we'll find out eventually.
>
> The Choopa (VULTR parent company) network infrastructure is fairly robust
> from what I gathered reading many many posts about the service on
> lowendtalk.com.
>
>  I saw many cheap cloud providers which claimed to support Tor, yet
>> after little time just when the relay was becoming popular and known
>> in the consensus, service terminated. Hope VULTR will not follow this way.
>>
>
> I think the VPS providers are more likely to fold in the face of pressure.
> Too big and they're likely gutless and/or compromised.
>
> There's probably a sweet spot that's willing to "Throw down for freedom"
> somewhere in the middle. (Sonic.net for example)
>
> I should have also mentioned in my previous post I put the following in
> /etc/tor/torrc
>
> # Bandwidth and data caps
> AccountingStart day 19:45 # calculate once a day at 7:45pm
> AccountingMax 33 GBytes # 33GB X 30 days = 10GB shy of 1000GB/mo.
> RelayBandwidthRate 3000 KBytes
> RelayBandwidthBurst 3750 KBytes # allow higher bursts but maintain average
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>



-- 
http://www.backbox.org
http://www.pentester.iz.rs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20141123/9a8f69bc/attachment.html>