[tor-relays] Decision on Dedicated Server for Exit Node

[Libertas]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

When was this? Can you give more details about your experience?

On 11/21/2014 07:10 PM, Rafael Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> My personal experience with them was awful... but then again it
> could've just been my personal experience. I paid ahead of time for
> one "hybrid" server from BalticServers and I will try to avoid them
> at all cost (Total amount: 164.59 EUR) per month/ 6 months. They
> may have had improved their service over time though; I don't know
> but I won't put my money in again to find out.
> 
> On 2014-11-21 18:45, Niklas Kielblock wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I can't say much about BalticServers in general, but their AS
>> currently houses nine relays, two of which are exits (search
>> compass.torproject.org for AS59642). You're increasing diversity
>> as long as you're not adding to the upper half of networks, so I
>> think that should be fine.
>> 
>> niklas
>> 
>> On 22/11/2014 00:28, Libertas wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I've been
>>> looking for a budget dedicated server to host an exit node on,
>>> and the best option I've found is BalticServers. However,
>>> they're already listed on the GoodBadISPs wiki page, and
>>> because they're in Northeast Europe (Lithuania, to be precise)
>>> I'm concerned that their ISP already has more exit nodes than
>>> is healthy for network diversity. Is it a good idea to host
>>> another exit node there? If you think there's a better option,
>>> I'd appreciate it if you could tell me either publicly or 
>>> privately. Thanks, Libertas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1 
>>> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUb8qfAAoJELxHvGCsI27Nx0sP/j5wBhV7EJZZ4EJoPgnoEH8A
>>>
>>> 
i6cDB3sL+Q50MgZivZLG47U+wdj95EJeIRl16RsaL0JaShVwyvbpStaIuhpOoujX
>>> FN0oumg3Z27fists+CSImLAHHHyr3a526XbWQazKZ7ReBvBZeIOa4PKA/OWsI8wg
>>>
>>> 
CWogwEWxbVNMojWaHMID3Y43qEeSH/T0R9ibqyrvqoZrOhnVqH1+1HzVs4FAWoST
>>> UMS2m/+b1qL4riL20XyaS0SUO0OkNbL3ecBnCN9LZJwMMuXVB4QNrsBSNFtDTpeu
>>>
>>> 
r8ZPJ/DxLJuQOtOvluSqqriKZCCi2lFAHovcXAf2ele0xqPrnJLFXDvhKkuAlv2o
>>> wQb+hdpBZ95u073cu/md8vTYVzA8NJ/sRTPmsWtxdRR8PMVpx59+BOAWNYMLWgEu
>>>
>>> 
JdTVinsbaWuKKTCtsZY0KAmYRbYC8E0O46z3OnOaeLX2s4MLUK/rPV3FoOAJ0tA3
>>> ixnJ0kjuaFiBN7SRn+N4imBEmt5DP3cbPmai6YX5FzaL0RjlD+1uWk/ZxV66iK3c
>>>
>>> 
YrisgQ0bWFbVCGeztblvBGQF3o6cElCJ26Cvy3EaTn7No+1d4f+/1rYwYCmNHjYY
>>> mdfUhSfWWFNv+oaF9MU/IHek45l+yrTHHZlhrk3pmFX/bcUWWcfcYX1D/aMhgH58
>>>
>>> 
7p48+5liXZOtSuVK44aS =/fUH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> _______________________________________________ tor-relays
>>> mailing list tor-relays at lists.torproject.org 
>>> <mailto:tor-relays at lists.torproject.org> 
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
>>> 
_______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> <mailto:tor-relays at lists.torproject.org> 
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays at lists.torproject.org 
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=2Smk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----