[tor-relays] Scoreboard enhancements / Trying Trusted Tor Traceroutes

[Anupam Das]

Sorry for the previous incomplete email. So as I was saying I found the
following IPs per relays in our collected data-

IPs-used   #relays
1             88
13           1
149         1
2             2
28           1
3            1
4            1
5           1

Total IPs =294 (2 more than what you see on the scoreboard because of some
previous initial test runs executed by others).

So we can say roughly 96 relays participated with 68 of them finishing.

Thanks

Anupam



On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Anupam Das <anupam009 at gmail.com> wrote:

> So I went through the data collected from the relays I
>
> Ips used      #relays
> 1 88
> 13 1
> 149 1
> 2 2
> 28 1
> 3 1
> 4 1
> 5 2
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:53 PM, tor-admin <tor-admin at torland.me> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 26 January 2014 16:27:12 renke brausse wrote:
>> > The needed time (even for the default of scamper with 1000 pps) is imho
>> > a rather good explanation to torland's question why only 68 of nearly
>> > 300 participating IPs finished the whole measurement at least once.
>> I launched the script from a high capacity tor relay host as well as from
>> a
>> VPS. I did not see a big difference in time. On both it finished within
>> around
>> 4 days.
>>
>> I would assume that someone who reads the documents/FAQ about the script,
>> checks it and starts it, will not kill it before it finishes. So I am
>> wondering if there is another reason for the high number of unfinished
>> script
>> cycles.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> torland
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20140126/37140128/attachment.html>