[tor-relays] Irony and inconsistency

Richard Budd rotorbudd at gmail.com
Sun Jan 12 18:30:33 UTC 2014


Same thing here.
I had a server from day one with them and was told "Sorry you've been with
us from the start.
But after careful consideration, Crissic Solutions LLC has decided to ban
the usage of TOR on the Crissic network."


On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder at snydernet.net>wrote:

> On 01/03/2014 05:46 PM, I wrote:
>
>> In this morning's messages -
>>
>> One about three relays paid for a year in advance.
>>
>> “Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite
>> “We DO Allow Tor Relays"  being in their current AUP.
>>
> [snip]
>
> I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation.  It is
> Crissic Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy.
>
> When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different
> reasons, primarily network related."  My take is that they didn't like
> their users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for.
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20140112/b05e2b06/attachment.html>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list