[tor-relays] bridge pool assignments

[isis]

eliaz transcribed 0.9K bytes:
> Can a bridge carry client traffic even though the bridge hasn't been
> assigned to a pool?
> 
> This is evidently the case for my bridge. It's been running for quite a
> while and registering respectable bandwidth and client use. Uptime has
> been near 100%. The only downtimes have been to install OS (win7)
> updates and other housekeeping. I usually do this housekeeping monthly
> rather than weekly.
> 
> As I recall, for previous restarts I've seen pool assignments within a
> few hours. They've sometimes been https, sometimes email. But this last
> restart has been running two weeks and the bridge DB shows no pool
> assignment.
> 
> Has anyone else experienced this? What's the remedy?
> 
> If it would help anyone figure this out I can post details, graphs, etc.
> along as they don't compromise the bridge. - eliaz

Hello!

Unless something is broken, BridgeDB is still assigning your bridge to a
distribution pool.  However, if you're looking at your bridge in Atlas [0],
then the "bridge pool assignment" field has been removed, and it should soon
be removed from Globe [1] as well.  See #13921. [2]

[0]: https://atlas.torproject.org
[1]: https://globe.torproject.org
[2]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13921

-- 
 ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft
_________________________________________________________
OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35
Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1154 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20141226/a8a0bb89/attachment.sig>