[tor-relays] 0.2.4.17-rc on Pi, a couple weeks on

Andy Isaacson adi at hexapodia.org
Thu Sep 19 01:28:18 UTC 2013


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:43:13PM -0700, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
> Thanks, Roger.  I'm still not sure what finally caused the OOM-killer
> crash this morning after almost a couple weeks (?) of uptime.  I was
> also seeing additional clock jump messages but didn't have time to
> diagnose it.  The Pi does not have a battery-backed RTC so it requires
> a clock set at each start, accomplished by 'ntpdate' and kept in time
> with, in my case, 'openntpd'.  But, 'openntpd' wasn't complaining at
> the time of the clock jumps that were reported by Tor, and AFAIK
> 'ntpdate' is not scheduled to run periodically, so I don't know what's
> causing it yet.

The "Your system clock just jumped 100 seconds forward" messages are
unlikely to be due to NTP.  Much more likely the Tor daemon was blocked
for a significant time period, due to swapping or similar.

What does top show?  In particular the "Mem" and "Swap" lines, and the
process line for the Tor process.  Here's a large Xeon server running 4
Tor daemons:

top - 18:26:40 up 16 days, 18:18,  1 user,  load average: 3.79, 3.95, 3.96
Tasks:  99 total,   4 running,  95 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 69.0%us,  5.1%sy,  0.0%ni, 19.4%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  6.5%si,  0.0%st
Mem:   8176824k total,  6361748k used,  1815076k free,    36336k buffers
Swap:        0k total,        0k used,        0k free,   183736k cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
14567 debian-t  20   0 2003m 1.8g  21m R  109 22.7   4477:00 tor
30171 debian-t  20   0 2390m 1.8g  20m R  100 23.6  13544:10 tor
18891 debian-t  20   0 1800m 1.5g  23m R   86 19.8   3134:31 tor
 8798 debian-t  20   0  324m 149m  31m S   21  1.9  36:48.05 tor

A similar picture from your RPi might shed some light on the situation.

-andy


More information about the tor-relays mailing list