[tor-relays] Too little traffic on my #2 non-exit relay

[Logforme]

Weird that #1 has the stable flag and #2 don't then.
"Stable" -- A router is 'Stable' if it is active, and either its
Weighted MTBF is at least the median for known active routers or its
Weighted MTBF corresponds to at least 7 days."
The above suggests that #1 has been known to the dirauths for a while
(since it got stable) and #2 either restarts a lot or has not been
around for long.

On 2013-09-18 20:41, Christian Dietrich wrote:
> Thanks, but both relays have been started at the same time.
> Due to the fact that they also have the same configuration,
> both should offer up to 1 gigabit/s bandwidth.
>
> "RelayBandwidthRate 125 MBytes
> RelayBandwidthBurst 125 MBytes"
>
> Both relays are exactly the same, except for the IPv4 adress.
>
>> Your #2 relay is only advertising 83.96 KB/s so it's no surprise it gets
>> low traffic.
>> Can it be that #1 is an old relay and #2 is relatively new? If #2 is new
>> it needs time to ramp up traffic:
>> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay
>>
>> On 2013-09-18 18:57, Christian Dietrich wrote:
>>> Hey there,
>>>
>>> I'm currently running two tor (non-exit) relays on one host machine.
>>> "000000000000myTOR1" and "000000000000myTOR2".
>>> Now my problem is that tor relay #2 generates almost no traffic.
>>>
>>> https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/000000000000myTOR
>>>
>>> Log Relay #1:
>>> Circuit handshake stats since last time: 1566234/14743525 TAP,
>>> 10428/10433 NTor.
>>> Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 7 days 6:00 hours, with 56008 circuits
>>> open. I've sent 2167.46 GB and received 1567.97 GB.
>>>
>>> Log Relay #2:
>>> Circuit handshake stats since last time: 63/63 TAP, 1/1 NTor.
>>> Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 7 days 6:00 hours, with 4 circuits open.
>>> I've sent 1.58 GB and received 844.66 MB.
>>>
>>> Both have the same binary and configuration (except incoming/outgoing
>>> IPv4). I've also tried to switch from
>>> "fully self compiled debian, with custom kernel, and own tor binary"
>>> to "Out of the Box Ubuntu LTS, with torproject tor package"
>>> .. without any improvement. Both relays works as expected.
>>>
>>> OT: for my opinion avg 150 mbit/s (99% done by node #1) is too less
>>> for an Ivy-Bridge Based Xeon Quad Core (/w HT) on an unshared gigabit
>>> line.
>>> Apart from the fact that multithread support is really missing.
>>>
>>> Can anyone give me a hint, or am i just too stupid? Thanks ;)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>