[tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]

Travis Northrup northruptc at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 23:41:51 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, it can. The program can spend the processor time to run that extra
instruction set. Do we actually need or want that? Would it be worth
spending the cpu time in exchange for just a miniscule effort to do it
ourselves?

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 3:53:25 PM, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Travis Northrup:
>>
>>
>>> This argument (Mbit/s versus GiB/month) reminds me of the old
>>> saw about the most useless unit of velocity (furlongs/fortnight
>>> instead of m/sec).
>>
>>> Mick
>>
>> I know exactly what you mean. Personally, I consider any change to
>> be a convenience modification only. In reality the only current
>> differences are in defining storage rate and traffic rate
>> (1024/1000 respectively) and its defined in bits. From there all
>> conversions are simple math that should be operator
>> responsibility.
>
> Why, when the config file can be liberal in what it accepts in the
> numerator, and in the denominator (seconds, days, weeks, mean months)?
>
> Calculating numbers is a job for a computer.
>
> Best,
> - -Gordon M.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSlRhVAAoJED/jpRoe7/ujzC0IANGMKvdbnvOO9lebNa81ETo9
> 6st2Dyt8Cy3qVmWevVT3JP6GZIpLVAk4M5SeFUm3abY2kbphIJfnnKVGYR/B3ggI
> 5uVTUN5uFIZmePAoMxHh53Y9ss5IYizvFFli3jaeg7iJnYjQl6zeogBCp275YCR0
> tbNeZ4BisXzXUDavTm5c23x0d9fo7z7b7i+SMhPs3DanZG3JLPHtTX+aYiBRjRlY
> hZJE9K6i+cvYEEId24tqo/uymEw8BFeCj5Ws32Gj9fHXSn64JDUaEawmmTXXsfvA
> DTUGLbRAVfdRDWrQl9JXTZLswMkis5SrrTeoehwo93cjgvl5z7uBa6/rK9WxwzY=
> =MdoA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSlTG/AAoJECJSqAwXZ/cnKcIIALVECDceF/aKsJV+D7nxVaJ8
H6tjAwj3nKqY1/LR8uPg7Z3E4mfuIRi6df/WUMxH1NP0sbFpWz1NY30iOEt9lAb1
fLY+exqmCYBifoNB7e5Gcss2QcqGhoCl6T9HYVoT9QmFZrlZvjr0goBCPQEdYwqC
p2wW0zZftzCFKl3jCTtAiYslDvCLbujyYtlVWFqjlQjAuWNMJ0z/7Ntx4kquSzCc
vKioMv95oQVT2MZywh5amNYNr/qYiKWYbAzL8FwZm9PMG2MQjZGiLxRpmwzmUrp6
HwSGjATO4dOSrRfPWsAW/XwJuioJbILdJUIrs9bXYubN9cX8BSp4PgtMziFDfAw=
=BeA7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the tor-relays mailing list