[tor-relays] Google Groups Exit Policy Reject?

[Jonathan Baker-Bates]

I should point out that the complaint wasn't sent to me directly, but
somebody I know saw it on a usenet group and forwarded it, asking whether
the Tor community was aware of it.

So as Roger points out, it's not a "routine" complaint, and in fact the
complainant appears to know about and understand Tor. The complaint is in
fact against Google so I think ignoring it would be the right course of
action in this case as I don't want to be caught up in some anti-Google
argument, regardless of what the detail of the issues are.

Jonathan


On 25 February 2013 10:52, Roger Dingledine <arma at mit.edu> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:15:01AM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> >  I'd explain what Tor, why it is
> > important to have Tor around and how the complainer could block traffic
> > from Tor exit nodes if really needed.
>
> In this particular case, I assume the complainer is "some dude upset
> about what's getting posted via google groups". So the usual answer
> (https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq-abuse#Bans) doesn't apply to him,
> since he can't make any decisions on behalf of Google.
>
> I can see how he'd be frustrated, and how he'd resort to mailing Tor
> exit relay operators one-by-one in hopes of solving his problem.
>
> But I can also see how it won't solve his problem.
>
> --Roger
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130225/2d63f2f7/attachment.html>