[tor-relays] new relays

[lee colleton]

HTTP-without-porn should be called BurkaHTTP. I'm sure there's a backronym
that will fit…
On Aug 28, 2013 4:15 AM, "mick" <mbm at rlogin.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:34:13 -0700
> Andy Isaacson <adi at hexapodia.org> allegedly wrote:
>
> >
> > If only there were a separate TCP port for HTTP-with-Porn and all the
> > pornographers used it, then an exit policy for "HTTP-without-porn"
> > would be possible.  But alas, we don't even have vague agreement on
> > what constitutes porn, much less a social contract requiring all
> > pornographers to segregate their traffic for our convenience.
> >
> > RFC6969, Pornographic HTTP.  #ideasforapril1
>
> Wonderful! Love it. (I have often pondered the possibility of a DPI
> "porn filter" which rejects traffic based on the "proportion of flesh
> coloured packets to the total" or some such nonsense. Second order
> problem - define "flesh coloured".)
>
> Best
>
> Mick
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Mick Morgan
>  gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B  72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312
>  http://baldric.net
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130828/66410ab7/attachment.html>