[tor-relays] new relays

[mick]

On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:34:13 -0700
Andy Isaacson <adi at hexapodia.org> allegedly wrote:

> 
> If only there were a separate TCP port for HTTP-with-Porn and all the
> pornographers used it, then an exit policy for "HTTP-without-porn"
> would be possible.  But alas, we don't even have vague agreement on
> what constitutes porn, much less a social contract requiring all
> pornographers to segregate their traffic for our convenience.
> 
> RFC6969, Pornographic HTTP.  #ideasforapril1

Wonderful! Love it. (I have often pondered the possibility of a DPI
"porn filter" which rejects traffic based on the "proportion of flesh
coloured packets to the total" or some such nonsense. Second order
problem - define "flesh coloured".)

Best

Mick 
---------------------------------------------------------------------

 Mick Morgan
 gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B  72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312
 http://baldric.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130828/f3610adf/attachment.sig>