[tor-relays] "NumCPUs 2" or 2 copies of Tor?

[Roman Mamedov]

On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:28:59 +0200
Moritz Bartl <moritz at torservers.net> wrote:

> On 07.08.2013 22:11, Steve Snyder wrote:
> > Given plenty of RAM, a muti-core CPU and a single IP address, which is
> > more efficient:
> > 
> > a single instance of Tor configured with "NumCPUs 2" or 2 instances of
> > Tor configured with "NumCPUs 1" and different port numbers?
> 
> Tor does not scale well across multiple cores. If you hit a single core
> limit, you will have to spin up more processes. NumCPU does not help much.

While we are on this topic, is there a limit on the number of nodes per IP
address? I have two nodes running on one IP (different ports), tried adding a
third one, but it can't seem to be able to register:

Aug 06 22:39:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus.
Aug 06 22:39:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 2 days 11:57 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 11.38 MB and received 59.12 MB.
Aug 06 23:06:22.000 [notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit. Looks like client functionality is working.
Aug 06 23:06:25.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
Aug 07 04:39:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus.
Aug 07 04:39:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 2 days 17:57 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 12.87 MB and received 64.58 MB.

and this just goes on forever.

-- 
With respect,
Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130808/c4ab9203/attachment.sig>