[tor-relays] Mystery of bridge utilization

[Konstantinos Asimakis]

More private pool? Meaning which pool exactly?

(I'm expecting something in the lines of "I could tell you but I'd have to
kill you")
On Apr 2, 2012 10:31 AM, "Runa A. Sandvik" <runa.sandvik at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder at snydernet.net>
> wrote:
> > I've got 2 bridges, with 1 IP address in each of 2 servers in the same
> geographical area.  The IP addresses are not consecutive.
> >
> > Both servers have the same hardware and software configurations.  Both
> were established in mid-January and (excepting a few brief periods of down
> time) have been running since then.
> >
> > So why then in March did one server handle 200GB of traffic while the
> other handled only 2GB?  (Yes, a x100 difference.)
>
> Sounds like one bridge ended up in the https or email pool (meaning we
> give the bridge address out via bridges.torproject.org or
> bridges at torproject.org), while the other ended up in a more private
> pool.
>
> > Also: is there something I can do to make my under-utilized bridge more
> attractive to the Bridge Authorities?
>
> You could set it up as a relay instead?
>
> --
> Runa A. Sandvik
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20120402/e63767a6/attachment.html>