答复:_problem_with_bridges_and_a_suggestion

datoudatou datoudatou at gmail.com
Fri May 28 05:30:24 UTC 2010


faint...
On 2010年05月26日 15:45, frank wrote:
> wistal,
>
> what do you mean by "嗯,那就好,看到住宿情况了吧"?
>
>   "嗯,那就好,看到住宿情况了吧"是啥意思?
>
> sincerely,
> 		
> frank
> 2010-05-26
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> sender: wistal
> sending date: 2010-05-26 10:40:36
> receiver: tor-relays at torproject.org; tor-relays at freehaven.net
> cc:
> subject: 答复:_problem_with_bridges_and_a_suggestion
>
> 嗯,那就好,看到住宿情况了吧?
>
> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人: t f<for.tor.bridge at gmail.com>
> 发送时间: 2010年5月25日 星期二 17:23
> 收件人: tor-relays at freehaven.net
> 主题: problem with bridges and a suggestion
>
> dear friends,
>
> problem:
> china is blocking TOR  more and more strict,
> I can't establish a TOR circuit even I updated bridges in config file
> of torrc with info retrieved from https://bridges.torproject.org and
> email replies from bridges at torproject.org.
> this morning, I got some new bridges through a hidden https proxy and
> established a TOR circuit, but after some time, I lost the connection
> and couldn't  establish a TOR circuit any more.
>
> from my knowledge to china's blocking methods, I believe they found my
> newly got bridges through network traffic protocol analysis, and
> blocked them.
>
> so my suggestion is:
> 1.
> use a general protocol for TOR clients to interact with bridges, so
> that they can't distinguish the traffic between TOR clients and
> bridges,
> so that they can't find new bridges got through private ways.
> 2.
> the general protocol could be https which is encryption protected;
> the general protocol could be plain http, if you can encode its
> content dynamically and privately, and don't make it display any
> fingerprints.
>
> by the way, I'm not a native english speaker, please pardon my awkward english.
>
> sincerely
>
> frank
>    



More information about the tor-relays mailing list