[tor-project] Arranging new default obfs4 bridges

David Fifield david at bamsoftware.com
Tue Mar 14 02:41:53 UTC 2017


On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 02:34:39PM +0100, Mart van Santen wrote:
> Are there any special requirements (hardware/network) for a obfs4
> bridges and what are the typical resources needed? I think we have
> sufficient capacity within our infrastructure to support you with this,
> but would like some details. A quick scan on the Internet didn't reveal
> any surprising, but probably you know all better. Also, are there any
> geographical preferences?

There are no real requirements for hardware or network, though of course
the bigger the better. You should count on about 1.5 cores being
consumed by tor and obfs4proxy, so a two-core machine may struggle
(bridge operators: does that match your experience?).

Here are some of the existing default bridges; you can see from their
bandwidth graphs that they tend to read/write 5–30 MB/s:
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/D9C805C955CB124D188C0D44F271E9BE57DE2109
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3E0908F131AC417C48DDD835D78FB6887F4CD126
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FEC8FB380DABA9D3C80790B634E4540BF5D09CCA
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FFD3FAB14109181882D3F25F78A9FE1840D113DD
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/D3D4A456FCB5F301F092F6A49ED671B84B432FB8

As for geographic preferences, I don't know.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/attachments/20170313/a1c560ae/attachment.sig>


More information about the tor-project mailing list