[tor-project] Arranging new default obfs4 bridges

[teor]

Hi Sina, Tom,

Can Team Cymru or Mozilla help out by running obfs4 bridges?

If so, David would love to hear from you.

> On 9 Mar 2017, at 22:33, David Fifield <david at bamsoftware.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:27:33PM +1100, teor wrote:
>>> On 9 Mar 2017, at 22:24, David Fifield <david at bamsoftware.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In November 2016 there was a discussion on the tor-team list about
>>> adding some new default obfs4 bridges (Subject: Coordinating to run high
>>> capacity obfs4 bridges). The thread turned into a discussion about the
>>> same entity running both bridges and exits, and didn't go anywhere.
>>> 
>>> We haven't added any new obfs4 bridges, or changed the port number of
>>> any existing bridges, since January 2017 (Tor Browser 6.5 and 7.0a1). I
>>> suspect that the 20 existing default bridges are still under high load
>>> and we could stand to have some more bridges to help share it. Are we
>>> still interested in adding new obfs4 bridges? If so, do we have any
>>> leads on who could run them?
>> 
>> Team Cymru and Mozilla recently asked how they could help out.
> 
> If you know who is was at those organizations, can you have them contact
> me or tbb-dev at lists.torproject.org? We can get them the information they
> need to get bridges running and get them integrated into the browser.

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
------------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/attachments/20170309/4c21c970/attachment.sig>