[tor-project] [Proposal] Social Contract

[Georg Koppen]

Damian Johnson:
> I'd be fine with the following alternative for a vote: ask on
> tor-internal@ if anyone opposes to the ratification of the social
> contract. If after two weeks zero people object then it's ratified.
> 
> If at least one person says nay it goes to a vote.

That's not a good idea. You would basically say "no" as you want to have
a vote and then we'd have a vote. That would basically boil down to you
saying "It's getting a vote because I, Damian, say it gets a vote."

Georg

> 
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Alison <macrina at riseup.net> wrote:
>> Silvia [Hiro]:
>>> On 04/04/17 20:52, Georg Koppen wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>> So, let's drop that re-ratifying idea of the same things altogether. It
>>>> creates more problems than it solves and does not add more legitimacy to
>>>> previous decisions.
>>> Totally agree w/ this.
>>>
>>> -silvia
>>
>> I am totally fine to go with whatever is preferred by the majority. I
>> initiated the proposal because I had a few requests for it. I know that
>> Damian is one of the people who really wants a vote; I'm happy to leave
>> this open for a few days and see if anyone else agrees with him.
>>
>> Alison
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-project mailing list
>> tor-project at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project
> _______________________________________________
> tor-project mailing list
> tor-project at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/attachments/20170405/e2a20541/attachment.sig>