[tor-onions] Renaming Rendezvous Single Onion Services

[Ann O'Nymous]

Paul Syverson:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:22:31PM -0500, Aaron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> All qualitative labels will have this problem: Free, Libre, Open,
>>> Closed, Hidden, Public, Private ... all of these describe an
>>> abstract intent, rather than a technology.  Such qualitative
>>> label-names are inevitably presumptuous of {some} implementer's
>>> intent.
>>
>> I am definitely arguing to convey intent rather than to convey
>> technical implementation. We had reached an equilibrium with “single
>> onion services” that nickm upset because it didn’t properly convey
>> intent.
>>
> 
> Well I remain completely opposed to anything conveying intent and regard
> that as just a mistake for our purposes. 

<cut>

> I favor:
> 
> "onion services" for all kinds of err onion services
> "single onion services" for all kinds of err single onion services

<cut>

> A possible compromise I'm mixed about, but hey compromise
> 
> plain onion services
> or 
> simple onion services
> 
> (Keep rendezvous as needed).  

<cut>

How about "fast onion services"? That is the real intent, right?