[tor-dev] Shortcuts to data-heavy parts of the bootstrapping process

Holmes Wilson h at zbay.llc
Wed Sep 7 23:28:13 UTC 2022


Thanks, this is super helpful.

And yes, it was that error message. The "such as paths to onion services" was a tease, because I was like "oh yes, that's exactly what I need! I should ask someone about this!" :)

Here's to a glorious future full of scalable directory designs that are both practical and theoretical!

H

On Fri Sep 2, 2022, 01:41 AM GMT, Roger Dingledine <mailto:arma at torproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:10:35AM +0000, Holmes Wilson wrote:
>> At some point I got an error message that indicated that it was giving up but that I had enough information to connect to onion addresses. I can't reproduce the problem now on a normal network, and I just went through the Tor code looking for the error message I saw, but I couldn't find it.
>
> It was probably this one:
> https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/32165
>> But I figured I'd ask here to see if anyone was familiar with shortcuts Tor can take in its connection process that safely save time and bandwidth on slow connections if the only thing I intend to use Tor for is connecting to onion addresses.
>
> For very throttled network connections, there is another long-standing
> issue that people run into during bootstrapping:
> https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/16844
>> Are there any steps in bootstrapping that can be skipped if I only care about making and receiving onion address connections?
>
> Hm! I think the answer is "nothing easy that you can do currently."
>
> You still need to learn about most of the relays in the network, in order
> to make proper three-hop circuits on your side that are hard to predict
> even for somebody who watches what subset of the directory information you
> learn (this is a category of attacks known as 'epistemic attacks', in this
> case on routing; see https://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/#danezis-pet2008
> for more).
>
> In the glorious future, we might have more theoretically scalable
> directory designs, such as the Walking Onions approach:
> https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity20/presentation/komlo
> but those won't be out anytime soon and also maybe it will turn out that
> they are most useful for their theoretical scaling properties rather
> than their practical ones.
>
> --Roger
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-dev mailing list
> tor-dev at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20220907/4578cde8/attachment.htm>


More information about the tor-dev mailing list