[tor-dev] Proposal 301: Don't include package fingerprints in consensus documents

Iain Learmonth irl at torproject.org
Wed Mar 13 17:50:39 UTC 2019


>> On 25/02/2019 23:30, teor wrote:
>>> Looks good to me, let's merge it as an "accepted" proposal?

This is now proposal 301.

What is the process by which this becomes "accepted"? Is this just a
matter of someone making that commit?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20190313/42fdbba5/attachment.sig>

More information about the tor-dev mailing list