[tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port
meejah at meejah.ca
Tue Nov 7 17:48:21 UTC 2017
David Goulet <dgoulet at ev0ke.net> writes:
> I'm unsure between
> "512 Syntax error in command argument"
> "552 Unrecognized entity"
> [A configuration key, a stream ID, circuit ID, event,
> mentioned in the command did not actually exist.]
> But overall yes!
It looks like the previous code would have done a 512 (when ADD_ONION
existed but didn't support authentication yet) so that's probably good
...but, maybe "513 Unrecognized command argument" would be a good
...or even a new one for this case (and future cases) of "recognized,
but not yet supported". "560 Not yet implemented" or similar?
More information about the tor-dev