[tor-dev] RelayAwards - incentives
nusenu at openmailbox.org
Fri Jul 1 20:44:00 UTC 2016
> - We started this
> website because we believe that competition can make more operators
> improve their relay by following best practice. This would make the
> whole Tor-network better if we have straight guidelines.
If it is about competing operators then you should aggregate an
operator's tor instances not care to much about single tor instances of
a given operator? You might just team-up with http://tor-roster.org/
Creating incentives for a high uptime would create incentives to run
relays insecurely (never upgrade, never reboot, run vulnerable software
I wouldn't give away awards for low uptimes either - just leave it out
of the equation?
With over 94% CW  being routed by Linux relays, why is it good to
run more Linux relays?
I'd say create incentives for non-Linux relays.
How about anti-incentives?
-5 for relays @ OVH added after a certain point in time?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the tor-dev