[tor-dev] Proposals should have reviews. Let's make sure that happens. Here's a schedule.

[Nick Mathewson]

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:39 PM, isis <isis at torproject.org> wrote:
> Nick Mathewson transcribed 2.8K bytes:
>> Here's the schedule I have in mind for the  first meeting, based on
>> proposals already nominated at the IRC dev meeting.
>
> This idea and the schedule sound great to me.  (Minus that the HS devs should
> be at the HS one.)  Thanks, Nick!
>
> Side note: I've never understood the difference between [OPEN] and [ACCEPTED].
> xIs [OPEN] like "waiting for adoption"?
>

Rather than answer immediately, I'll send you towards proposal 001,
which is supposed to explain this kind of thing.  Please let me know
if it does a bad job explaining!  ;)

cheers,
-- 
Nick