[tor-dev] Proposal: Tor with collective signatures
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
teor2345 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 30 00:16:02 UTC 2016
> On 30 Apr 2016, at 01:13, Tom Ritter <tom at ritter.vg> wrote:
>> 3.4 Optional: Break-the-glass Emergency Directory Adjustments
>> With even fancier crypto, even the witnesses would not
>> necessarily need
>> to know, but that’s beyond the scope of this proposal and its
>> desirability may
>> be questionable at any rate.
> I love me some fancy crypto, but I question the need for this feature
> at all, let alone more complex versions of it.
This looks like a "golden key" from a distance, and, if there's a bug in the implementation, it could well become one.
I'd want to make sure we really needed this feature before implementing it.
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the tor-dev