[tor-dev] onionoo: bug in family set detection?
teor2345 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 2 21:11:48 UTC 2015
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:52:00 +0000
From: nusenu <nusenu at openmailbox.org>
> > MyFamily requires bidirectional declarations to be effective.
> I'm aware of that fact ;)
> > In this case: OnionOO appears to correctly implement the
> > bidirectional MyFamily logic
> Apparently it doesn't.
> Since onionoo says there is a bidirectional "connection" (family) between
> 5510FC1736B16D46D3F2DDA5011995C478D42594 =>
> but there is none.. (as explained in my last email)
> Compass does *not* say that there is a bidirectional connection
> between those relays.. onionoo says there is one even though I can't
> see it, do you see it?
I'm sorry, I must have got the onionoo and Compass results mixed up somehow.
In Compass, I see that:
5510FC1736B16D46D3F2DDA5011995C478D42594 has no family.
In Globe/Atlas (based on onionoo), I see that:
5510FC1736B16D46D3F2DDA5011995C478D42594 has a very large family.
So my criticism of Compass actually applies to onionoo.
teor2345 at gmail dot com
teor at blah dot im
OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the tor-dev