[tor-dev] Revising Proposal 140

Daniel Martí mvdan at mvdan.cc
Thu May 1 16:23:26 UTC 2014


On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:27:38 -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> One alternative in this case would be to include non-running relays in
> the consensus.  This would make each individual consensus longer, but
> (if your guess is right) might make compressed diffs shorter.

That's an interesting idea. We could include non-running relays in the
consensus for, say, half a day. I don't know how often do relays
temporarily stop running, or how long do they generally do it for - I
shall investigate.

-- 
Daniel Martí - mvdan at mvdan.cc - http://mvdan.cc/
PGP: A9DA 13CD F7A1 4ACD D3DE  E530 F4CA FFDB 4348 041C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20140501/8067c9aa/attachment.sig>


More information about the tor-dev mailing list