[tor-dev] building from source in a 64-bit windows environment..
zackw at panix.com
Sat May 18 15:55:48 UTC 2013
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Anthony Martin <ality at pbrane.org> wrote:
> Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix.com> once said:
>> * Win64 is the *only* flat-memory-space ABI ever promulgated in
>> which pointers cannot safely be converted to 'unsigned long'
>> and back without loss of information. This is a willful
>> violation of requirements in C89 and is IMNSHO sufficient
>> justification to refuse to port to this platform, all by itself.
> This is just wrong. There's nothing wrong with having long
> be the same size as int. And Windows isn't the only 64-bit
> platform that does it. Plan 9 works the same way.
There's nothing wrong with sizeof(long) == sizeof(int), but I assure
you that C89 does require sizeof(long) >= sizeof(void *) [more
precisely, that a valid value of type 'void*' can be cast to 'unsigned
long' and back without loss of information] provided also that the
memory space is flat. It is not itself a spelled-out requirement in
the standard, but it follows from two requirements which are
explicitly stated. First, 'size_t' is required to be able to represent
the size of any object; when the memory space is flat, this entails
that 'void*' can be cast to 'size_t' and back without loss of
information. Second, 'size_t' is required to be no larger than
For further exposition, please see comp.std.c archives in the time
period leading up to C99. This was argued over in great detail
because Microsoft forced the C committee to remove the second of the
above two requirements from C99, over basically everyone else's
objections, precisely so they could say the Win64 ABI wasn't a C
conformance violation, *and then didn't implement any of the C99
features that would have made this less of a catastrophe for people
trying to write portable code*. <stdint.h> was only added to MSVC in
the 2010 edition (and only because C++ picked it up); there's still no
<inttypes.h> and you still can't use %zu in printf.
Yes, I am still bitter.
More information about the tor-dev