[tor-dev] resistance to rubberhose and UDP questions
rransom.8774 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 6 14:08:41 UTC 2012
On 10/6/12, Mike Perry <mikeperry at torproject.org> wrote:
> Yet still, as Roger and Robert point out, there are some serious
> questions about the viability of decentralized directory/consensus
> systems. Or, at least questions that sexified attack papers can make to
> seem serious. (For example: I don't believe TorSK was actually broken
> beyond Tor's current properties...).
Torsk relied on a trusted party to sign relay descriptors. Its goal
was to reduce the (asymptotic) total amount of directory
communication, not to remove the need for directory authorities.
More information about the tor-dev