[tor-dev] circuitmux_ewma.c

[Gisle Vanem]

"Nick Mathewson" <nickm at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> I'm happy to open another ticket for these, but have you tried using the
> bugtracker yourself? Is there some UI issue or something that prevents you
> from opening tickets? 

I used the easy way-out; sent an email. It didn't occured at the time, there
was a bugtracker. Will use that next time,.

>  * Second, the workaround is error-prone.  If the fields in the structure
> are ever designated in an order that doesn't match their declaration order
> in the structure definition, we'll get a situation where C99-compliant
> compilers generate the code as intended, but where non-C99-compliant
> compilers fail, or worse-- generate different code.

I'm aware of that. That's probably why that C99 feature was added.

--gv