Proposal: Separate streams across circuits by destination port or destination host

[Robert Ransom]

On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:23:06 +0100
Robert Hogan <robert at roberthogan.net> wrote:

> Maybe there are other things Tor could do with the SOCKS connection if 
> username information is not present:
> 
> - Do not share SOCKS4/4a/5 on the same circuit.
> - On *nix use the source port to look up the connection's application name 
>   in  /proc/pid/cmdline and, if cmdline is readable, treat that as a SOCKS
>   username when choosing circuits.

- Do not share circuits across multiple client IP addresses (when
  SocksPort is exposed to a local network).
- Do not share circuits across clients connecting to different SOCKS
  ports (when the SocksListenAddress is used to specify multiple SOCKS
  listeners).


Robert Ransom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20100808/2e8482ac/attachment.pgp>