Plan for proposal 104 (was: New system for modifying Tor protocol)

Nick Mathewson nickm at
Wed Mar 21 03:23:58 UTC 2007

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:19:42PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> This is a pretty good point; I think this is the way we should go.
> I'm thinking we need another draft on the proposal before we can call
> it done, but we're making good progress.

I've added a draft specification to proposal 104, and incorporated the
results of this discussion as I understand them.  With luck, there
will be enough detail to this thing now that we can figure out how it
will work.

Nick Mathewson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 652 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the tor-dev mailing list