[tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues

Jacob Appelbaum jacob at appelbaum.net
Fri Jan 9 15:53:55 UTC 2015


Heya,

I have no idea why this happened - urras seems to be completely fine.

Urras appears to be voting as of a minute ago as well.

On 1/9/15, atagar at torproject.org <atagar at torproject.org> wrote:
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from maatuska was missing the following authority
> signatures: urras
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from tor26 was missing the following authority
> signatures: urras
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from urras was missing the following authority
> signatures: urras
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from longclaw was missing the following authority
> signatures: urras
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from dizum was missing the following authority
> signatures: urras
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from gabelmoo was missing the following authority
> signatures: urras
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from moria1 was missing the following authority
> signatures: urras
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from dannenberg was missing the following
> authority signatures: urras
> NOTICE: Consensus fetched from Faravahar was missing the following authority
> signatures: urras
> WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth
> scanner results: maatuska


More information about the tor-consensus-health mailing list