[community] Wikipedia page review

[Caroline Sinders]

sorry to jump in, folks!
::puts on wikimedia hat:: i would not do a public call at all for help,
because you're technically not supposed to edit your own page or have the
institution or any one paid by an institution edit said page.

i would recommend me one person actually edit the page. you can organize
all the edits in a separate place and then put them in. but if any pedantic
editors suspect this was done by an affiliate, they will revoke the edits,
etc.

i would recommend organizing here, and getting a handful of people to write
the edits, then share back here, and then have one person s-l-o-w-l-y copy
paste in so it doesn't look like spam or bot activity.

best!
caroline

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Alison Macrina <
alison at libraryfreedomproject.org> wrote:

> On 06/12/2018 03:57 PM, Celeste S. [jaruga] wrote:
> > Hello folks!
> >
> > Hope everyone has had a fantastic beginning to the week.
> >
> > I recently reviewed the English Tor Wikipedia page as per our
> > conversation at the last meeting. All and all, it was accurate; there
> > were probably some parts that were understated and others that were
> > overstated, but there was nothing too glaring. I'm not sure who will be
> > dealing with the changes, but I can chat with them as well if further
> > information is needed.
>
> Thanks for taking such an in-depth look at this!!!
>
> I'm wondering how we might best put out a call for help on these edits.
> tor-project@ list seems like an obvious place. Maybe also good to
> include in the message that the non-English pages need some love.
>
> Unless someone else wants to organize a sprint to do this? I think it's
> a really good idea but I don't have the time to take it on myself. :(
>
> Alison
>
> >
> > I did have a few suggestions, though they mostly pertain to formatting
> > and elaborating on existing content:
> >
> > 1. 'Tor Browser' header could use a more concise explanation and feature
> > list
> >
> > 2. 'Third party applications' subheader could use some loving as you can
> see
> >
> > 3. 'Levels of Security' header - why is this a million miles below the
> > browser section? Could use revisions as well
> >
> > 4. 'Tor Messenger' bar should be removed - as it's no longer current or
> > reccomended, it would be better to not showcase it any longer.
> >
> > If anyone had opinions or additions to this list feel free to mention
> them!
> >
> > Thanks a lot, see you all tomorrow. 😊
> >
> > -- jaruga
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tor-community-team mailing list
> > tor-community-team at lists.torproject.org
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-community-team
> >
> _______________________________________________
> tor-community-team mailing list
> tor-community-team at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-community-team
>



-- 
Caroline Sinders
interaction designer, researcher, artist
caroline-sinders.squarespace.com
713-203-0116
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-community-team/attachments/20180614/c7db24e1/attachment.html>