[tor-commits] [torspec/main] simple grammar issues in prop321

[arma at torproject.org]

commit e06b912e9d95a7ebf7663ecd150ba5262a3f6f18
Author: Roger Dingledine <arma at torproject.org>
Date:   Wed Sep 29 05:21:39 2021 -0400

    simple grammar issues in prop321
---
 proposals/321-happy-families.md | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/proposals/321-happy-families.md b/proposals/321-happy-families.md
index 288ba66..f9ac7b4 100644
--- a/proposals/321-happy-families.md
+++ b/proposals/321-happy-families.md
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ we can de-duplicate families which sometimes helps.)  Adding or
 removing a server from the family requires all the other servers to
 change their torrc settings.
 
-The is growth in size is not just a theoretical problem. Family
+This growth in size is not just a theoretical problem. Family
 declarations currently make up a little over 55% of the
 microdescriptors in the directory--around 24% after compression.
 The largest family has around 270 members.  With Walking Onions, 270
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ requirements and providing a more detailed migration plan.
 In this design, every family has a master ed25519 "family key".  A node
 is in the family iff its server descriptor includes a certificate of its
 ed25519 identity key with the family key.  The certificate
-format the one in the tor-certs.txt spec; we would allocate a new
+format is the one in the tor-certs.txt spec; we would allocate a new
 certificate type for this usage.  These certificates would need to
 include the signing key in the appropriate extension.
 
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ need to do in this event would be to move to a new private family
 key.
 
 A more orthodox method would be to keep the private key somewhere
-offline, and using it to generate a certificate for each relay in
+offline, and use it to generate a certificate for each relay in
 the family as needed.  These certificates should be made with
 long-enough lifetimes, and relays should warn when they are going to
 expire soon.
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ microdescriptors' family lines:
    digest of the microdescriptor listed in the original votes.  (This
    calculation is deterministic.)
 
-The problem with this approach is that authorities would have to s
-to fetch microdescriptors they do not have in order to replace their
+The problem with this approach is that authorities would have to
+fetch microdescriptors they do not have in order to replace their
 family lines.  Currently, voting never requires an authority to
 fetch a microdescriptor from another authority.  If we implement
 vote compression and diffs as in the Walking Onions proposal,