[tor-commits] [tor-browser-build/master] Bug 34011: Bump clang to 9.0.1

sysrqb at torproject.org sysrqb at torproject.org
Fri Jul 17 03:48:22 UTC 2020


commit 1555bfb9d7dafa42c18ef04c0763c884f4862f22
Author: Georg Koppen <gk at torproject.org>
Date:   Thu Jun 11 09:54:09 2020 +0000

    Bug 34011: Bump clang to 9.0.1
    
    We add a new project to not interfere with non-mobile toolchain
    requirements for now until both series are moved to the non-ESR release
    train.
---
 projects/fenix-clang/43909.patch | 252 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 projects/fenix-clang/build       |  45 +++++++
 projects/fenix-clang/config      |  36 ++++++
 3 files changed, 333 insertions(+)

diff --git a/projects/fenix-clang/43909.patch b/projects/fenix-clang/43909.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..78d2a75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/projects/fenix-clang/43909.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+From c95310f2d4fd3c88241c3b5d6dbf6251d34a3256 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv at gmail.com>
+Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:22:18 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] Restructure caching
+
+Variant on D70103. The caching is switched to always use a BB to
+cache entry map, which then contains per-value caches. A separate
+set contains value handles with a deletion callback. This allows us
+to properly invalidate overdefined values.
+
+A possible alternative would be to always cache by value first and
+have per-BB maps/sets in the each cache entry. In that case we could
+use a ValueMap and would avoid the separate value handle set. I went
+with the BB indexing at the top level to make it easier to integrate
+D69914, but possibly that's not the right choice.
+
+Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70376
+
+diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp
+index 110c085d3f3..aa6862cb588 100644
+--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp
++++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp
+@@ -133,12 +133,9 @@ namespace {
+   /// A callback value handle updates the cache when values are erased.
+   class LazyValueInfoCache;
+   struct LVIValueHandle final : public CallbackVH {
+-    // Needs to access getValPtr(), which is protected.
+-    friend struct DenseMapInfo<LVIValueHandle>;
+-
+     LazyValueInfoCache *Parent;
+ 
+-    LVIValueHandle(Value *V, LazyValueInfoCache *P)
++    LVIValueHandle(Value *V, LazyValueInfoCache *P = nullptr)
+       : CallbackVH(V), Parent(P) { }
+ 
+     void deleted() override;
+@@ -152,89 +149,63 @@ namespace {
+   /// This is the cache kept by LazyValueInfo which
+   /// maintains information about queries across the clients' queries.
+   class LazyValueInfoCache {
+-    /// This is all of the cached block information for exactly one Value*.
+-    /// The entries are sorted by the BasicBlock* of the
+-    /// entries, allowing us to do a lookup with a binary search.
+-    /// Over-defined lattice values are recorded in OverDefinedCache to reduce
+-    /// memory overhead.
+-    struct ValueCacheEntryTy {
+-      ValueCacheEntryTy(Value *V, LazyValueInfoCache *P) : Handle(V, P) {}
+-      LVIValueHandle Handle;
+-      SmallDenseMap<PoisoningVH<BasicBlock>, ValueLatticeElement, 4> BlockVals;
++    /// This is all of the cached information for one basic block. It contains
++    /// the per-value lattice elements, as well as a separate set for
++    /// overdefined values to reduce memory usage.
++    struct BlockCacheEntryTy {
++      SmallDenseMap<AssertingVH<Value>, ValueLatticeElement, 4> LatticeElements;
++      SmallDenseSet<AssertingVH<Value>, 4> OverDefined;
+     };
+ 
+-    /// This tracks, on a per-block basis, the set of values that are
+-    /// over-defined at the end of that block.
+-    typedef DenseMap<PoisoningVH<BasicBlock>, SmallPtrSet<Value *, 4>>
+-        OverDefinedCacheTy;
+-    /// Keep track of all blocks that we have ever seen, so we
+-    /// don't spend time removing unused blocks from our caches.
+-    DenseSet<PoisoningVH<BasicBlock> > SeenBlocks;
+-
+-    /// This is all of the cached information for all values,
+-    /// mapped from Value* to key information.
+-    DenseMap<Value *, std::unique_ptr<ValueCacheEntryTy>> ValueCache;
+-    OverDefinedCacheTy OverDefinedCache;
+-
++    /// Cached information per basic block.
++    DenseMap<PoisoningVH<BasicBlock>, BlockCacheEntryTy> BlockCache;
++    /// Set of value handles used to erase values from the cache on deletion.
++    DenseSet<LVIValueHandle, DenseMapInfo<Value *>> ValueHandles;
+ 
+   public:
+     void insertResult(Value *Val, BasicBlock *BB,
+                       const ValueLatticeElement &Result) {
+-      SeenBlocks.insert(BB);
+-
++      auto &CacheEntry = BlockCache.try_emplace(BB).first->second;
+       // Insert over-defined values into their own cache to reduce memory
+       // overhead.
+       if (Result.isOverdefined())
+-        OverDefinedCache[BB].insert(Val);
+-      else {
+-        auto It = ValueCache.find_as(Val);
+-        if (It == ValueCache.end()) {
+-          ValueCache[Val] = make_unique<ValueCacheEntryTy>(Val, this);
+-          It = ValueCache.find_as(Val);
+-          assert(It != ValueCache.end() && "Val was just added to the map!");
+-        }
+-        It->second->BlockVals[BB] = Result;
+-      }
+-    }
+-
+-    bool isOverdefined(Value *V, BasicBlock *BB) const {
+-      auto ODI = OverDefinedCache.find(BB);
+-
+-      if (ODI == OverDefinedCache.end())
+-        return false;
++        CacheEntry.OverDefined.insert(Val);
++      else
++        CacheEntry.LatticeElements.insert({ Val, Result });
+ 
+-      return ODI->second.count(V);
++      auto HandleIt = ValueHandles.find_as(Val);
++      if (HandleIt == ValueHandles.end())
++        ValueHandles.insert({ Val, this });
+     }
+ 
+     bool hasCachedValueInfo(Value *V, BasicBlock *BB) const {
+-      if (isOverdefined(V, BB))
+-        return true;
+-
+-      auto I = ValueCache.find_as(V);
+-      if (I == ValueCache.end())
++      auto It = BlockCache.find(BB);
++      if (It == BlockCache.end())
+         return false;
+ 
+-      return I->second->BlockVals.count(BB);
++      return It->second.OverDefined.count(V) ||
++             It->second.LatticeElements.count(V);
+     }
+ 
+     ValueLatticeElement getCachedValueInfo(Value *V, BasicBlock *BB) const {
+-      if (isOverdefined(V, BB))
++      auto It = BlockCache.find(BB);
++      if (It == BlockCache.end())
++        return ValueLatticeElement();
++
++      if (It->second.OverDefined.count(V))
+         return ValueLatticeElement::getOverdefined();
+ 
+-      auto I = ValueCache.find_as(V);
+-      if (I == ValueCache.end())
++      auto LatticeIt = It->second.LatticeElements.find(V);
++      if (LatticeIt == It->second.LatticeElements.end())
+         return ValueLatticeElement();
+-      auto BBI = I->second->BlockVals.find(BB);
+-      if (BBI == I->second->BlockVals.end())
+-        return ValueLatticeElement();
+-      return BBI->second;
++
++      return LatticeIt->second;
+     }
+ 
+     /// clear - Empty the cache.
+     void clear() {
+-      SeenBlocks.clear();
+-      ValueCache.clear();
+-      OverDefinedCache.clear();
++      BlockCache.clear();
++      ValueHandles.clear();
+     }
+ 
+     /// Inform the cache that a given value has been deleted.
+@@ -248,23 +219,18 @@ namespace {
+     /// OldSucc might have (unless also overdefined in NewSucc).  This just
+     /// flushes elements from the cache and does not add any.
+     void threadEdgeImpl(BasicBlock *OldSucc,BasicBlock *NewSucc);
+-
+-    friend struct LVIValueHandle;
+   };
+ }
+ 
+ void LazyValueInfoCache::eraseValue(Value *V) {
+-  for (auto I = OverDefinedCache.begin(), E = OverDefinedCache.end(); I != E;) {
+-    // Copy and increment the iterator immediately so we can erase behind
+-    // ourselves.
+-    auto Iter = I++;
+-    SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &ValueSet = Iter->second;
+-    ValueSet.erase(V);
+-    if (ValueSet.empty())
+-      OverDefinedCache.erase(Iter);
++  for (auto &Pair : BlockCache) {
++    Pair.second.LatticeElements.erase(V);
++    Pair.second.OverDefined.erase(V);
+   }
+ 
+-  ValueCache.erase(V);
++  auto HandleIt = ValueHandles.find_as(V);
++  if (HandleIt != ValueHandles.end())
++    ValueHandles.erase(HandleIt);
+ }
+ 
+ void LVIValueHandle::deleted() {
+@@ -274,18 +240,7 @@ void LVIValueHandle::deleted() {
+ }
+ 
+ void LazyValueInfoCache::eraseBlock(BasicBlock *BB) {
+-  // Shortcut if we have never seen this block.
+-  DenseSet<PoisoningVH<BasicBlock> >::iterator I = SeenBlocks.find(BB);
+-  if (I == SeenBlocks.end())
+-    return;
+-  SeenBlocks.erase(I);
+-
+-  auto ODI = OverDefinedCache.find(BB);
+-  if (ODI != OverDefinedCache.end())
+-    OverDefinedCache.erase(ODI);
+-
+-  for (auto &I : ValueCache)
+-    I.second->BlockVals.erase(BB);
++  BlockCache.erase(BB);
+ }
+ 
+ void LazyValueInfoCache::threadEdgeImpl(BasicBlock *OldSucc,
+@@ -303,10 +258,11 @@ void LazyValueInfoCache::threadEdgeImpl(BasicBlock *OldSucc,
+   std::vector<BasicBlock*> worklist;
+   worklist.push_back(OldSucc);
+ 
+-  auto I = OverDefinedCache.find(OldSucc);
+-  if (I == OverDefinedCache.end())
++  auto I = BlockCache.find(OldSucc);
++  if (I == BlockCache.end() || I->second.OverDefined.empty())
+     return; // Nothing to process here.
+-  SmallVector<Value *, 4> ValsToClear(I->second.begin(), I->second.end());
++  SmallVector<Value *, 4> ValsToClear(I->second.OverDefined.begin(),
++                                      I->second.OverDefined.end());
+ 
+   // Use a worklist to perform a depth-first search of OldSucc's successors.
+   // NOTE: We do not need a visited list since any blocks we have already
+@@ -320,10 +276,10 @@ void LazyValueInfoCache::threadEdgeImpl(BasicBlock *OldSucc,
+     if (ToUpdate == NewSucc) continue;
+ 
+     // If a value was marked overdefined in OldSucc, and is here too...
+-    auto OI = OverDefinedCache.find(ToUpdate);
+-    if (OI == OverDefinedCache.end())
++    auto OI = BlockCache.find(ToUpdate);
++    if (OI == BlockCache.end() || OI->second.OverDefined.empty())
+       continue;
+-    SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &ValueSet = OI->second;
++    auto &ValueSet = OI->second.OverDefined;
+ 
+     bool changed = false;
+     for (Value *V : ValsToClear) {
+@@ -333,11 +289,6 @@ void LazyValueInfoCache::threadEdgeImpl(BasicBlock *OldSucc,
+       // If we removed anything, then we potentially need to update
+       // blocks successors too.
+       changed = true;
+-
+-      if (ValueSet.empty()) {
+-        OverDefinedCache.erase(OI);
+-        break;
+-      }
+     }
+ 
+     if (!changed) continue;
+-- 
+2.24.0
+
diff --git a/projects/fenix-clang/build b/projects/fenix-clang/build
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c8cceb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/projects/fenix-clang/build
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+[% c("var/set_default_env") -%]
+distdir=/var/tmp/dist/[% project %]
+mkdir -p /var/tmp/dist
+tar -C /var/tmp/dist -xf [% c('input_files_by_name/cmake') %]
+export PATH="/var/tmp/dist/cmake/bin:$PATH"
+[% IF c("var/linux") %]
+  # We need a link to our GCC, otherwise the system cc gets used which points to
+  # /usr/bin/gcc.
+  [% pc('gcc', 'var/setup', { compiler_tarfile => c('input_files_by_name/gcc'),
+                              hardened_gcc => 0 }) %]
+  ln -s gcc /var/tmp/dist/gcc/bin/cc
+[% END -%]
+mkdir -p /var/tmp/build
+cd /var/tmp/build
+tar -xf $rootdir/[% c('input_files_by_name/llvm') %]
+tar -xf $rootdir/[% c('input_files_by_name/clang') %]
+tar -xf $rootdir/[% c('input_files_by_name/libcxx') %]
+tar -xf $rootdir/[% c('input_files_by_name/libcxxabi') %]
+tar -xf $rootdir/[% c('input_files_by_name/lld') %]
+tar -xf $rootdir/[% c('input_files_by_name/compiler-rt') %]
+mv llvm-* llvm
+# LLVM has reproducibility issues when optimizing bitcode, which we need to
+# patch. See: #32053 for more details.
+patch -p1 < $rootdir/43909.patch
+mv clang-* llvm/tools/clang
+mv libcxx-* llvm/projects/libcxx
+mv libcxxabi-* llvm/projects/libcxxabi
+mv lld-* llvm/tools/lld
+mv compiler-rt-* llvm/projects/compiler-rt
+cd llvm
+export LLVM_HOME=$(pwd)
+mkdir build
+cd build
+cmake .. -G "Unix Makefiles" -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$distdir \
+                             -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release \
+     [% IF c("var/rlbox") -%]-DLLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=WebAssembly \[% END -%]
+                             $LLVM_HOME
+make -j[% c("buildconf/num_procs") %]
+make install
+cd /var/tmp/dist
+[% c('tar', {
+        tar_src => [ project ],
+        tar_args => '-czf ' _ dest_dir _ '/' _ c('filename'),
+    }) %]
diff --git a/projects/fenix-clang/config b/projects/fenix-clang/config
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8f16354
--- /dev/null
+++ b/projects/fenix-clang/config
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# vim: filetype=yaml sw=2
+version: 9.0.1
+filename: '[% project %]-[% c("version") %]-[% c("var/build_id") %].tar.gz'
+gpg_keyring: clang.gpg
+sig_ext: sig
+
+var:
+  container:
+    use_container: 1
+
+input_files:
+  - project: container-image
+  - name: '[% c("var/compiler") %]'
+    project: '[% c("var/compiler") %]'
+    enable: '[% c("var/linux") %]'
+  - project: cmake
+    name: cmake
+  - URL: 'https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/download/llvmorg-[% c("version") %]/llvm-[% c("version") %].src.tar.xz'
+    name: llvm
+    file_gpg_id: 1
+  - URL: 'https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/download/llvmorg-[% c("version") %]/clang-[% c("version") %].src.tar.xz'
+    name: clang
+    file_gpg_id: 1
+  - URL: 'https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/download/llvmorg-[% c("version") %]/libcxx-[% c("version") %].src.tar.xz'
+    name: libcxx
+    file_gpg_id: 1
+  - URL: 'https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/download/llvmorg-[% c("version") %]/libcxxabi-[% c("version") %].src.tar.xz'
+    name: libcxxabi
+    file_gpg_id: 1
+  - URL: 'https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/download/llvmorg-[% c("version") %]/lld-[% c("version") %].src.tar.xz'
+    name: lld
+    file_gpg_id: 1
+  - URL: 'https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/download/llvmorg-[% c("version") %]/compiler-rt-[% c("version") %].src.tar.xz'
+    name: compiler-rt
+    file_gpg_id: 1
+  - filename: 43909.patch





More information about the tor-commits mailing list