[tor-commits] r25327: {website} now that the flood is over, get rid of the sopa-pipa page, w (website/trunk/en)

Roger Dingledine arma at torproject.org
Thu Jan 19 17:57:45 UTC 2012


Author: arma
Date: 2012-01-19 17:57:45 +0000 (Thu, 19 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 25327

Modified:
   website/trunk/en/sopa-pipa.wml
Log:
now that the flood is over, get rid of the sopa-pipa page, while still
letting it function for those who linked to it


Modified: website/trunk/en/sopa-pipa.wml
===================================================================
--- website/trunk/en/sopa-pipa.wml	2012-01-19 08:06:20 UTC (rev 25326)
+++ website/trunk/en/sopa-pipa.wml	2012-01-19 17:57:45 UTC (rev 25327)
@@ -1,68 +1,8 @@
 ## translation metadata
-# Revision: $Revision: 25296 $
-# Translation-Priority: 2-medium
+# Revision: $Revision: 23689 $
+# Status: obsolete
 
-#include "head.wmi" TITLE="Blackout Against Copyright Overreach: Stop SOPA and PIPA" CHARSET="UTF-8"
+#include "head.wmi" TITLE="Redirecting" REDIRECT_GLOBAL="https://blog.torproject.org/blog/blackout-against-copyright-overreach-stop-sopa-and-pipa"
 
-<div id="content" class="clearfix">
-  <div id="maincol">
-    <!-- PUT CONTENT AFTER THIS TAG -->
-    <h1><a href="https://blog.torproject.org/blog/blackout-against-copyright-overreach-stop-sopa-and-pipa">Blackout Against Copyright Overreach: Stop SOPA and PIPA</a></h1>
-<hr>
-<p>
-The Tor Project doesn't usually get involved with U.S. copyright
-debates. But SOPA and PIPA (the House's "Stop Online Piracy Act" and the
-Senate's "Protect-IP Act") go beyond enforcement of copyright. These
-copyright bills would strain the infrastructure of the Internet, on
-which many free communications -- anonymous or identified -- depend.
-Originally, the bills proposed that so-called "rogue sites" should be
-blocked through the Internet's Domain Name System (DNS). That would have
-broken DNSSEC security and shared U.S. censorship tactics with those of
-China's "great firewall."
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Now, while we hear that DNS-blocking is off the table, the bills remain
-threatening to the network of intermediaries who carry online speech. Most
-critically to Tor, SOPA contained a provision forbidding "circumvention"
-of court-ordered blocking that was written broadly enough that it <a
-href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2011/12/15/stopping-sopas-anti-circumvention.html">could
-apply to Tor</a> -- which helps its users to "circumvent"
-local-network censorship.  Further, both bills broaden the reach of
-intermediary liability, to hold conduits and search engines liable
-for user-supplied infringement. The private rights of action and
-"safe harbors" could force or encourage providers to censor well
-beyond the current DMCA's "notice and takedown" provision (of which <a
-href="https://www.chillingeffects.org/">Chilling Effects</a> documents
-numerous burdens and abuses).
-</p>
-
-<p>
-On January 18, we're joining <a
-href="https://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/16/wikipedias-community-calls-for-anti-sopa-blackout-january-18/">Wikipedia</a>,
-<a
-href="http://blog.reddit.com/2012/01/stopped-they-must-be-on-this-all.html">Reddit</a>,
-the <a
-href="http://blog.media.mit.edu/2012/01/media-lab-is-against-sopa-and-pipa.html">MIT
-Media Lab</a>, and <a href="http://americancensorship.org/">hundreds of
-others</a> in protest, turning a portion of the Tor site black to call
-attention to copyright balance and remind the US Congress and voters of
-the value of the open Internet.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-U.S. citizens, please call or write, to <a
-href="http://americancensorship.org/">urge your representatives to stop
-SOPA and PIPA</a>. Elsewhere in the world, keep an eye out for similar
-legislation. and bring the fight there too.
-</p>
-
-    <hr>
-    <h1>The above is a static version of our January 18 <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/blog/blackout-against-copyright-overreach-stop-sopa-and-pipa">blog post</a>.</h1>
-
-  </div>
-  <!-- END MAINCOL -->
-</div>
-<!-- END CONTENT -->
 #include <foot.wmi>
 



More information about the tor-commits mailing list