[or-cvs] r24191: {website} wtf, most of the links from the website to the wiki faq are (website/trunk/docs/en)

Roger Dingledine arma at torproject.org
Mon Feb 7 08:13:20 UTC 2011


Author: arma
Date: 2011-02-07 08:13:19 +0000 (Mon, 07 Feb 2011)
New Revision: 24191

Modified:
   website/trunk/docs/en/faq.wml
Log:
wtf, most of the links from the website to the wiki faq are dead anchors.
fix a few here, but there are like dozens more.


Modified: website/trunk/docs/en/faq.wml
===================================================================
--- website/trunk/docs/en/faq.wml	2011-02-07 08:06:17 UTC (rev 24190)
+++ website/trunk/docs/en/faq.wml	2011-02-07 08:13:19 UTC (rev 24191)
@@ -1142,11 +1142,11 @@
 
     <ul>
     <li>Tor has built-in support for <a
-    href="<wikifaq>#LimitBandwidth">
+    href="<wikifaq>#WhatbandwidthshapingoptionsareavailabletoTorrelays">
     rate limiting</a>. Further, if you have a fast
     link but want to limit the number of bytes per
     day (or week or month) that you donate, check out the <a
-    href="<wikifaq>#Hibernation">hibernation
+    href="<wikifaq>#HowcanIlimitthetotalamountofbandwidthusedbymyTorrelay">hibernation
     feature</a>.
     </li>
     <li>Each Tor relay has an <a href="#ExitPolicies">exit policy</a> that
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@
     <li>If your relay is behind a NAT and it doesn't know its public
     IP (e.g. it has an IP of 192.168.x.y), you'll need to set up port
     forwarding. Forwarding TCP connections is system dependent but
-    <a href="<wikifaq>#ServerForFirewalledClients">this FAQ entry</a>
+    <a href="<wikifaq>#ImbehindaNATFirewall">this FAQ entry</a>
     offers some examples on how to do this.
     </li>
     <li>Your relay will passively estimate and advertise its recent
@@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@
 
     <p>
     The default exit policy allows access to many popular services
-    (e.g. web browsing), but <a href="<wikifaq>#DefaultPorts">restricts</a>
+    (e.g. web browsing), but <a href="<wikifaq>#Istherealistofdefaultexitports">restricts</a>
     some due to abuse potential (e.g. mail) and some since
     the Tor network can't handle the load (e.g. default
     file-sharing ports). You can change your exit policy
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@
     <li>If you're running on Solaris, OpenBSD, NetBSD, or
     old FreeBSD, Tor is probably forking separate processes
     rather than using threads. Consider switching to a <a
-    href="<wikifaq>#RelayOS">better
+    href="<wikifaq>#WhydoesntmyWindowsorotherOSTorrelayrunwell">better
     operating system</a>.</li>
 
     <li>If you still can't handle the memory load, consider reducing the
@@ -1492,7 +1492,8 @@
 
     <p>
     Requiring every Tor user to be a relay would help with scaling the
-    network to handle all our users, and <a href="<wikifaq>#RelayAnonymity">running a Tor
+    network to handle all our users, and <a
+    href="<wikifaq>#DoIgetbetteranonymityifIrunarelay">running a Tor
     relay may help your anonymity</a>. However, many Tor users cannot be good
     relays &mdash; for example, some Tor clients operate from behind restrictive
     firewalls, connect via modem, or otherwise aren't in a position where they
@@ -1529,7 +1530,7 @@
     <a href="<page getinvolved/volunteer>#Research">research section of the
     volunteer page</a>: "Tor doesn't work very well when relays
     have asymmetric bandwidth (e.g. cable or DSL)". It might be that <a
-    href="<wikifaq>#TransportIPnotTCP">switching
+    href="<wikifaq>#YoushouldtransportallIPpacketsnotjustTCPpackets.">switching
     to UDP transport</a> is the simplest answer here &mdash; which alas is
     not a very simple answer at all.
     </p>



More information about the tor-commits mailing list