[tor-bugs] #32900 [Circumvention/BridgeDB]: Reimplement and generalise BridgeDB?

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Thu Jan 9 10:54:18 UTC 2020

#32900: Reimplement and generalise BridgeDB?
 Reporter:  phw                     |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  project                 |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium                  |      Milestone:
Component:  Circumvention/BridgeDB  |        Version:
 Severity:  Major                   |     Resolution:
 Keywords:                          |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                          |         Points:  20
 Reviewer:                          |        Sponsor:

Comment (by phw):

 Replying to [comment:1 atagar]:
 > Hi phw. The part above concerning Stem/zoossh seems to imply that this
 ticket is really about rewriting BridgeDB in Go? If so that's fine, but it
 seems an odd response to #30946.
 Yes, if I would rewrite it, I would do it in Go – but not only because of
 #30946. That was just the tipping point that led to me filing this ticket.
 > I haven't run BrideDB, but I'm very experienced with python3 porting. If
 you're stuck on #30946 maybe I can help?
 I would greatly appreciate your help with this. The majority of issues are
 due to Python 3's new string/bytes incompatibility, and it takes a lot of
 time to address these. Shall we continue over at #30946?

Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/32900#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

More information about the tor-bugs mailing list