[tor-bugs] #30735 [Core Tor/sbws]: Work out which relays are ignored by all sbws instances

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#30735: Work out which relays are ignored by all sbws instances
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
 Reporter:  teor                                 |          Owner:  juga
     Type:  task                                 |         Status:
                                                 |  needs_review
 Priority:  Very High                            |      Milestone:  sbws:
                                                 |  1.1.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/sbws                        |        Version:
 Severity:  Critical                             |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  must-keep-3-torflow-blocker, sbws-   |  Actual Points:
  majority-blocker, sbws-roadmap                 |
Parent ID:  #33121                               |         Points:  6
 Reviewer:                                       |        Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by gk):

 Replying to [comment:8 juga]:
 > This check between other things, the missing relays in the bandwidth
 files: https://gitlab.torproject.org/juga/bwauthealth.
 >
 > I'm running it in a server, the created reports can be seen at
 http://twc2rnle3toroew3xfre3gtkuojra2rlcgsvl7ad3n4z2akuqvs4rxqd.onion.
 >
 > While the tool it's not adopted by Tor project nor run in its
 infrastructure, i don't think it is needed to review the code.
 >
 > It also checks whether the descriptors are being updated #33198 and
 total consensus weight (related to #33350).
 >
 > When longclaw changes to maint-1.1 branch, we can see whether our
 patches have fixed the main issues.

 What should I or someone else review? (given that the ticket is in
 `needs_review` but the request does not seem to be code related)

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30735#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online