[tor-bugs] #20350 [Metrics/CollecTor]: Replace create-tarball.sh shell script with Java module

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Thu Apr 2 07:24:33 UTC 2020


#20350: Replace create-tarball.sh shell script with Java module
-------------------------------+---------------------------------
 Reporter:  iwakeh             |          Owner:  metrics-team
     Type:  enhancement        |         Status:  assigned
 Priority:  Medium             |      Milestone:  CollecTor 2.0.0
Component:  Metrics/CollecTor  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal             |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  metrics-2018       |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:  #20518             |         Points:
 Reviewer:                     |        Sponsor:
-------------------------------+---------------------------------

Comment (by karsten):

 Looks like we had two tickets for this issue. Here's what I wrote in
 #31866 which I'm now closing as duplicate:

 We're currently generating tarballs using the `tar` and `xz` command-line
 tools triggered by a cronjob. While this is very fast, it doesn't
 integrate that well with the rest of our code. For example, it would be
 much easier to extract descriptor types, publication times, and file
 digests for #31204 if tarball generation happened in Java.

 One possible issue might be that generated tarballs are larger or that
 compression takes longer. This is something I wanted to figure out early,
 which is why I ran some tests today:

 ||= Compression preset level =||||= `xz` =||||= XZ for Java 1.6 =||
 ||  1  || 269M || 1m27.522s || 269M || 1m22.905s ||
 ||  3  || 77M || 1m6.590s || 77M || 1m15.03s ||
 ||  6  || 30M || 3m8.426s || 30M || 4m54.837s ||
 ||  9  || 18M || 2m56.801s || 18M || 5m6.998s ||
 ||  9e  || 16M || 7m2.364s |||| NA ||

 We're currently using `xz -9e`, but I can't find this option in XZ for
 Java. The closest is compression preset level 9. That means that our
 tarballs would be 18M/16M = 12.5% larger and be created in
 306.998s/422.364s = 73% of the current time.

 Is it a blocker that our tarballs would be 12.5% larger? If so, we might
 try harder to configure XZ for Java in the same way as `xz -9e` operates,
 even though that would very likely increase tarball generation time.

 Not working on this at the moment, just leaving my thoughts here for
 discussion and for picking this up as time permits.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/20350#comment:12>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online


More information about the tor-bugs mailing list