[tor-bugs] #31130 [Applications/Tor Browser]: Use Debian 10 for our Android container images

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#31130: Use Debian 10 for our Android container images
-------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
 Reporter:  gk                             |          Owner:  sisbell
     Type:  defect                         |         Status:
                                           |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium                         |      Milestone:
Component:  Applications/Tor Browser       |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                         |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  tbb-rbm, TorBrowserTeam201911  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:  #31127                         |         Points:  0.5
 Reviewer:                                 |        Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------+-------------------------------

Comment (by boklm):

 Replying to [comment:52 gk]:
 > Replying to [comment:51 boklm]:
 > > Replying to [comment:50 gk]:
 > > > Replying to [comment:48 sisbell]:
 > > > > Looks like we just need one additional dependency installed for
 the JDK headless installation. I verified a full build.
 > > > >
 > > > > https://github.com/sisbell/tor-browser-
 build/commit/005b6651ba42737c7e1bd177f01286294355c02f
 > > >
 > > > Okay, we are close. Looking over the patch again I see you are
 pointing to `https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/o/openjdk-8` for the
 openjdk packages. However, that seems to be brittle to me as it's easily
 conceivable that our version is getting superseded by newer updates in the
 couple of weeks, essentially getting unavailable. Better is using
 `snapshot.debian.org` (e.g.
 https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20191031T212011Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-8/).
 > >
 > > As it's an update for a stable distribution, I think previous versions
 of the packages are not removed from mirrors (until the whole suite is
 removed, which I think will not be before 2022 for stretch). So I think
 using `https://deb.debian.org/` is fine (but using snapshot.debian.org is
 fine too).
 >
 > I think you are wrong here. Have a look at
 >
 >
 https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20191001T024204Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-8/
 and
 >
 https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20191031T212011Z/pool/main/o/openjdk-8/
 >
 > in the former you still find `8u232-b04` binaries but not the latter
 right now there are `8u232-b09-1~deb9u1` ones *instead* of the former
 which the stable archive mirrors but it seems that's not guaranteed to
 hold. That is there seems to be no reason to assume that
 `8u232-b09-1~deb9u1` could not get replaced in the future by a successor,
 which is why I think we should go the snapshot route to be on the safe
 side.

 I think `8u232-b04` was removed because it never was in the
 stable/oldstable suite, but only in experimental:
 https://tracker.debian.org/news/1062184/accepted-openjdk-8-8u232-b04-1
 -source-into-experimental/

 Packages from unstable, experimental and testing are removed from mirrors
 when a new version of the package is available, however it seemed to me
 this was not the case for stable or oldstable, but after looking at it
 more closely it seems it is not always the case. So using snapshot sounds
 good.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/31130#comment:53>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online