[tor-bugs] #31356 [Core Tor/Tor]: 0.4.1 relays should list Padding=1, 2

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Aug 12 21:18:42 UTC 2019


#31356: 0.4.1 relays should list Padding=1,2
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
 Reporter:  mikeperry            |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  defect               |         Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium               |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.4.1.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor         |        Version:  Tor: 0.4.0.5
 Severity:  Normal               |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  wtf-pad, 041-should  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                       |         Points:  1
 Reviewer:                       |        Sponsor:  Sponsor2
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by mikeperry):

 * status:  needs_revision => needs_review


Comment:

 I think we should keep this simple, so that it can get in before
 0.4.1-stable, with low risk. We do not support alphas once the stable is
 released. This means that we can just bump the protover without doing all
 of the extra effort to phase out Padding=1 in stages.

 In other words: if this gets merged before 0.4.1-stable, then once
 0.4.1-stable is released, it won't matter that our older 0.4.1 alpha
 clients won't negotiate with newer 0.4.1 relays -- they are unsupported.
 Similarly, it doesn't matter if 0.4.1-stable clients won't negotiate with
 0.4.1-alpha relays -- those relays are also unsupported.

 Here is a cleanly organized PR against 0.4.1 that passes CI and is now
 actually ready for review: https://github.com/torproject/tor/pull/1230

 FTR: I didn't call you crazy. I called this entire situation crazy (which
 I meant to include my response). I meant "crazy" in the sense that what we
 were doing did not make sense to me and made things confusing to others.
 The thing that upset me was that I am capable of viewing the CI logs of
 PRs that I'm still actively rebasing and re-organizing.. I didn't need
 those logs to occupy space in this ticket, and I didn't want them to,
 which is why I didn't ask anyone to review it or even mention the branch
 yet.. That said, I should have reacted more reasonably myself rather than
 mirroring and exaggerating what I felt were unreasonable actions, which is
 a bad habit of mine that I have been trying to break. It was the end of a
 long week.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/31356#comment:8>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online


More information about the tor-bugs mailing list