[tor-bugs] #30255 [Core Tor/sbws]: Add additional bandwidth file headers in sbws 1.2

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Fri Apr 26 19:07:34 UTC 2019


#30255: Add additional bandwidth file headers in sbws 1.2
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
 Reporter:  teor           |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  task           |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium         |      Milestone:  sbws: 1.2.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/sbws  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal         |     Resolution:
 Keywords:                 |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                 |         Points:
 Reviewer:                 |        Sponsor:
---------------------------+-----------------------------------

Comment (by juga):

 Replying to [comment:5 karsten]:
 > irl and I discussed the topic of additional bandwidth headers as part of
 #30216, where we're trying to write a parser for these files.

 i'm unfamiliar with metrics ecosystem and i thought that implementing the
 parser in stem (#29056, #30160) would avoid you to re-implementing for
 metrics. Is there a way to avoid that?.

 > When reading this ticket and its subtickets I'm slightly concerned that
 you might consider adding spaces to new header lines.

 No, we should not add spaces. I made the mistake of writing the url of a
 wip branch in a ticket that should not have been reviewed yet.

 > For example, operating system and contact information sound like they
 might contain spaces.

 For the operating system, this is what the command suggested by teor would
 generate: `Linux-4.9.0-8-amd64-x86_64-with-glibc2.7`. It doesn't contain
 space.
 For the contact information, teor said:

 > Let's not specify another unstructured contact string, please.

 And imo, it should just be an email address, if we add contact
 information.

 But as far as I see it, that means trouble! One reason is that `bandwidth-
 file-headers` in dir-spec doesn't permit spaces in `KeyValue` parts, so
 that it wouldn't be possible to copy over header lines to the vote.
 >
 > Does this make sense?

 Yes

 > In fact, if it does, would you mind clarifying in the spec that header
 lines always have the format `HeaderLine ::= KeyValue NL`? That would also
 simplify the parser, because we'd then be able to distinguish header and
 relay lines by the number of space-separated `KeyValue` elements.

 Hmm, that makes sense, but it's not true for the first line `Timestamp
 NL`. Maybe we can just clarify that.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30255#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online


More information about the tor-bugs mailing list