[tor-bugs] #22453 [Core Tor/Tor]: Relays should regularly do a larger bandwidth self-test
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Nov 19 10:22:01 UTC 2018
#22453: Relays should regularly do a larger bandwidth self-test
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner: juga
Type: defect | Status:
| needs_revision
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.4.0.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: 034-triage-20180328, | Actual Points:
034-removed-20180328, tor-bwauth, |
035-backport, 034-backport-maybe, 033 |
-backport-maybe, 029-backport-maybe-not |
Parent ID: #25925 | Points:
Reviewer: teor | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by juga):
Replying to [comment:31 arma]:
> Replying to [comment:28 teor]:
> > > I don't think sbws suffers from similar issues, so once all the
torflow scanners are gone, we can disable the bandwidth self-test code.
Until then, it should be on and larger.
>
> I don't think we need to wait for all of the torflows to be gone. Isn't
it enough to have one sbws scanner? Since that scanner would generate
appropriate load on relays? And if we're worried that one isn't a stable
situation, we should work on getting a second one, rather than messing
with this design?
Currently sbws prioritizes measuring relays for which it doesn't have
results, it probably should then prioritize the relays with less uptime
and not being measured according to the consensus.
I can try to figure out how long it takes currently to sbws to measure
those relays.
If any of this sounds like a good idea, then i'll create tickets for sbws.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/22453#comment:32>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list