[tor-bugs] #19001 [Obfuscation/Snowflake]: Tor Browser with Snowflake
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Sun Apr 2 00:20:13 UTC 2017
#19001: Tor Browser with Snowflake
-----------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: dcf | Owner:
Type: project | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Obfuscation/Snowflake | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-----------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by dcf):
Replying to [comment:26 dcf]:
> == GN migration ==
>
> https://webrtc.org/native-code/development/ these days says "GYP is no
longer supported and likely to break soon. You’re encouraged to migrate to
GN as soon as possible."
>
> I pushed a first try at migrating to GN here:
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/dcf/tor-browser-bundle.git/log/?h
=snowflake-gn&id=2bb19e4c15446faf4ae8ac36e9d34847d80b4d8b
>
> The webrtc build works, however it's missing some symbols required by
go-webrtc, such as `FakeAudioCaptureModule`, which aren't accounted for
yet in the upstream GN build files. It seems that GN support for webrtc is
not complete yet, as [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/discuss-
webrtc/bcIpvWjrsxY/h3U8arVnCQAJ this message from August 10, 2016]:
> You seem to be setting the GN variables. WebRTC still uses GYP by
default which may explain why you don't see any change (we're on our way
to migrate to GN though).
>
> My plan is to forget about the GN migration until the next time we
update the webrtc upstream.
At comment:3:ticket:21748, arlolra posted a branch that among other things
uses GN rather than GYP. Does that mean the GN migration is finished, or
is there more to do on it?
https://github.com/arlolra/tor-browser-bundle/commits/gn
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19001#comment:30>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list