[tor-bugs] #19960 [Core Tor/Tor]: Tor v0.2.9.1-alpha-dev (git-b3f43a22ab921ce6) - failing options/validate__transproxy test on NetBSD

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Thu Dec 8 10:07:30 UTC 2016


#19960: Tor v0.2.9.1-alpha-dev (git-b3f43a22ab921ce6) - failing
options/validate__transproxy test on NetBSD
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------
 Reporter:  yancm                        |          Owner:
     Type:  defect                       |         Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium                       |      Milestone:  Tor:
                                         |  0.2.9.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor                 |        Version:  Tor:
                                         |  0.2.9.1-alpha
 Severity:  Normal                       |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  self test regression netbsd  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                               |         Points:
 Reviewer:                               |        Sponsor:
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------

Comment (by yancm):

 Replying to [comment:15 nickm]:
 > b) Does netbsd support ipfw or not?  We imply "yes" in test_options.c,
 but "no" in our definition of KERNEL_MAY_SUPPORT_IPFW.  Which of these is
 correct?

 I am pretty sure the answer is no. NetBSD has some support for pf (OpenBSD
 origins), ipf (independent project? Darren Reed author - no longer under
 development) and npf which is the new official mechanism in NetBSD as I
 understand.

 I've never used pf, I currently still use ipf only because too lazy to re-
 visit my rule-sets and replace scripts, etc.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19960#comment:19>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online


More information about the tor-bugs mailing list