[tor-bugs] #12023 [Tor]: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy cell?

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Fri May 16 14:02:14 UTC 2014


#12023: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy
cell?
------------------------+--------------------------------
     Reporter:  nickm   |      Owner:
         Type:  defect  |     Status:  new
     Priority:  normal  |  Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.5.x-final
    Component:  Tor     |    Version:
   Resolution:          |   Keywords:  tor-client
Actual Points:          |  Parent ID:
       Points:          |
------------------------+--------------------------------

Comment (by cypherpunks):

 So fix for #7912 introduces a "fun" property for client side of client-to-
 relay connection, but actually no change anything. Relay will close
 connection from client after last long-before-nothing-sent circuit was
 destroyed for both cases with and without #7912.
 While #6799 initially was about relay-to-relay connections. But if we want
 to fix client-to-relay connections expire time-out then yes need to
 rethink #6799.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12023#comment:5>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online


More information about the tor-bugs mailing list