[tor-bugs] #8163 [Tor]: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Mar 11 21:48:58 UTC 2013


#8163: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma      |          Owner:                     
     Type:  defect    |         Status:  new                
 Priority:  normal    |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.4.x-final 
Component:  Tor       |        Version:  Tor: 0.2.4.10-alpha
 Keywords:  tor-auth  |         Parent:                     
   Points:            |   Actualpoints:                     
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------

Comment(by nickm):

 So, do we in fact have an idea of how to fix this? We could try to
 grandfather in whichever nodes are currently in the consensus directory,
 but as soon as nodes drop out once, we'll be out of luck.  We could go
 with whichever node has been around the longest -- the one with the
 highest total_weighted_time or highest weighted_uptime in its rephist.
 Any other thoughts?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8163#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online


More information about the tor-bugs mailing list